Archive for January, 2010

Is Haiti fashionable now?

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Shortly after my last blog post, I was pleased to see that Haiti is now indeed fashionable. A new relief effort called “Hope for Haiti Now: A Global Benefit for Earthquake Relief,” spearheaded by a group of celebrities (including George Clooney), has raised over $61 million to date.

We can only hope Haiti remains fashionable in the future.

When will Haiti be fashionable?

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

In another year, on another blog…

I had blogged about my daughter’s trip to Haiti, and how it seems Haiti doesn’t get the attention it needs and deserves. Here, in part, is what I wrote:

You see, it seems some underprivileged countries have highly visible spokespersons to make them “fashionable.” Everyone knows Darfur needs help; we have George Clooney to keep their plight in our awareness. Other African countries, as well as Asian countries, have celebrities appearing on People magazine covers with their adopted children—Brad and Angelina and Madonna, to name a few. Even Eastern Europe has made the news lately when Americans have adopted their orphaned children.

What about Haiti? Are there any celebrities out there who’d like to speak for Haiti? We really need only one….

Now, with the devastating earthquake, perhaps—in a weird way—Haiti will finally get that attention. So many lives lost. So many people who, having nearly nothing before, have even less now. So many newly orphaned children. So many beautiful buildings forever destroyed.

Is it fashionable to help Haiti now?

Life imitates art

Monday, January 11th, 2010

It sounds like a cliché, but it’s often true. Something happens on TV or in a book or movie, and next thing you know, it’s being done in real life.

Sometimes this is a bad thing. A crime or other bad deed forms the plot of a TV show, and in no time “copycat” perpetrators are making the news.

But it’s not always a bad thing. Sometimes a screenwriter or other creative type will think of something that a scientific type hadn’t thought of, or had assumed was impossible. The creative type perhaps didn’t pause to think it might not be possible, or figured it would be believable enough for entertainment purposes.

Sooner or later, someone is asking, Hey, why not? Someone else responds, Indeed, why not? So some creative thinkers get together with some scientific thinkers and they create some great new thing.

Wouldn’t the thought-processing external voice box I talked about in my last post (like the ones in the movie Up) be a great invention to develop? People with speech problems, people who have trouble verbalizing their feelings, people taking a lie detector test…I see lots of applications for such a device. Yes, maybe even pets.

Anybody out there want to tackle this?

Variation on a theme

Monday, January 4th, 2010

I recently saw the movie Up. From what I hear, it’s been tremendously popular. My opinion of it was not quite unilaterally favorable—but I did like it.

The things I didn’t like were that the plot was a little crazy, and the true nature of Charles Muntz, Ellie’s lifelong hero, was disappointing…but I don’t want to give anything away.

What I did like was pretty much everything else: the animation, especially the facial expressions and body movements; the characters’ personalities; the lines. But my favorite thing was how the animals “talked”…but didn’t really.

Stop reading here if you don’t want it spoiled for you!

Now, I may be in small company with this opinion, but I don’t like movies in which animals talk. It just isn’t believable. Animals communicating with each other, okay. But animals cannot talk. They don’t have the part of the brain where the speech center is located. They don’t have the right shape mouth or facial muscles. They don’t have the intelligence to formulate complex thoughts.

But!

This is where Up solved the problem in a way that works for me. Being an animal lover, I know that animals think, and their thoughts are usually related to things such as food, needs for exercise or going to the bathroom, comfort or discomfort, and their feelings for their humans. So, in this movie, those thoughts are translated, by means of an electronic collar, into speech understandable by humans. So for example, a dog can certainly think (or feel, depending on how you look at  it) “I love you” to its master. If technology were able to translate those thoughts/feelings into human speech, a dog could indeed talk. So simple in theory!

As far as movie magic goes, it worked for me.